INVEST BETTER

Low-cost portfolio management for everyone
TAKE ME TO THE CALCULATOR
Made possible with the generous support of the following sponsors:

OUR MISSION

 

To fairly compare the cost of portfolio management that is online, at least partially automatic, and with no or very low account minimums

 

Investing is important; it’s what helps your money grow, which helps you meet your retirement and other goals in life.

There are lots of ways to invest, from doing it yourself to having a full-service financial advisory practice do for you. Traditionally your options were limited by the amount of money you had available to invest (full-service advisors usually have high account minimums) and where you lived (big-city folks had lots of options to choose from; small-town folks had far fewer, if any).

If you didn’t want to manage your own portfolio, didn’t have enough money or didn’t live in the right town, your default option was the bank or a door-to-door salesperson offering high-cost mutual funds.

Technology has created middle options that allow anyone with any amount of money to access low-cost, professional portfolio management from almost anywhere, and we want to help you get enough information to choose the best fit for you.

 

OUR METHODOLOGY

The various providers all use different pricing schemes, so comparing the costs can be pretty difficult without computer assistance, and there isn’t a simple “winner” — the costs of each will vary according to your situation. Moreover, cost is just a starting point: there are differences in what they provide beyond just “investing”, and the advanced tab will let you filter the selection of services available to better find one that fits your needs. 

Because there is more to the services, cost is not the only thing you should consider — the calculator will help you find the cheapest, but that’s not to say that it will be the best for you. Look at the offerings of a few and see what will fit your needs best.

There are a lot of moving parts to a comparison like this (which is why we think it’s helpful to make them) and we worked with the service providers to incorporate as many factors as possible, as accurately as possible.

i

Simplifications

We have included as many factors as accurately as possible, retaining as much detail as possible. However, a few simplifications were made. In our opinion and testing these will be of no material consequence to the final result.

For example, some providers have different model portfolio costs for non-registered, TFSA, and RRSP accounts, though the difference may be as small as a single basis point (0.01%). Some may also have different account minimums for an RESP or RRSP than a non-registered or TFSA. A single portfolio and account minimum was used for the comparison.

 

Data Collection

We collected detailed information from service providers through a survey, and validated the data with follow-up emails, meetings, and checking the information provided on their websites. Although we have worked hard to get the data right, we can’t guarantee that it’s completely free from error. Please make sure to to verify the actual fees you’ll pay if you decide to invest with any of the providers listed.

 

d

Underlying Portfolio

While the providers readily disclose their management fees on their websites, the fees of the ETFs and mutual funds used to build your portfolio are generally not readily available.

To enable apples-to-apples comparisons, we had each provider give us the costs for three generic portfolios: a “conservative” one (70% fixed income/30% equity), a “balanced” one (40% fixed income/60% equity), and a “growth” portfolio (20% fixed income/80% equity). Your specific portfolio will vary from these archetypes, but they serve as useful references for a fair comparison.

 

Updates

We try to stay as up-to-date as possible with changes that affect calculator results, but can’t guarantee that we’ll catch everything. We rely on service providers to inform us when significant changes are made to availability and costs, and users like you who let us know when things change. Please use the contact form at the bottom of this page to make suggestions or ask questions. 

 

w

ADVICE

Many firms offer advice as part of their service, but investment advice is not the same as financial planning advice. We broke the advice offered into five categories according to the ability to answer several key questions, to help you determine the kind of advice each firm offers:

 

  • Portfolio suitability advice (“Does this portfolio suit my financial circumstances and risk tolerance?”)
  • Saving advice (“How much do I need to save for my kids’ education?”)
  • Asset location advice (“What kind of investments should I hold in my RRSP vs. my non-registered account?”)
  • Goal setting advice (“Should I prioritized paying off my mortgage or saving for retirement?”)
  • Retirement planning advice (“When should I apply for CPP, how much can I spend, and which accounts should I withdraw from?”)

Stuff People Ask Us

Why isn't a DIY portfolio included as one of the comparisons?

We flirted with the idea, even going so far as programming a couch-potato style DIY portfolio into the calculator, but ultimately decided against it, because the DIY option is hands-down the cheapest across almost all cases, and we didn’t want to waste all of the time and effort we put into building the calculator for it to always and forever return a DIY portfolio as the result. For comparison purposes, a DIY ETF portfolio would cost approx. 0.15%, and a DIY TD e-series portfolio would cost approx. 0.44%, depending on the asset mix.

Why is Steadyhand included/Why is Mawer or Leith Wheeler not included?

We want to offer a low-cost, active alternative to the robo-advisors, but don’t feel as though we need to include every low-cost, active alternative. We are familiar with and like Steadyhand’s low-cost “undexing” philosophy, appreciate their tenure discounts for clients who stay with them for for years, and are fans of the low minimum threshold to invest directly with them instead of buying their funds through a discount brokerage. 

What are these “Bank Funds” you’re comparing to?

You might know them as “fund-of-funds”, “wrap funds”, “asset allocation funds”, or “managed portfolios”. Every bank offering includes a family of funds that are meant to operate as a standalone portfolio, with a target asset allocation and automatic rebalancing to that target, available to retail investors through the branch mutual fund sales force. We aggregated the fund data from RBC, TD, CIBC, Scotia, and BMO for each portfolio type represented in the calculator and used the average MER.

You might not be paying the amount we’ve used to compare. Ask your bank or mutual fund salesperson how much you’re actually paying if you’re unsure. (Hopefully they know and are willing to tell you.)

Who's paying for this?

We paid for the programming and website with our own money. It was expensive, and our ability to roll out improvements and updates will depend on sponsorship from here on out, either from you, our users, or from the service providers represented in the calculator. Our goal is to help you make informed investing decisions, and we’d like to keep the lights on while we do it.  

We include every service provider who meets our criteria of “low-cost portfolio management for everyone”,  and we publish the results of our customer surveys without editorial oversight from anyone but ourselves, whether they choose to sponsor our efforts or not. 

These robo advisors are pretty new. Is my money safe?

Investing involves risks, and that underlying risk (that your investments themselves may decline in value) is the same no matter how you get access to investments — through a robo-advisor, full-service advisor, or fund you purchase yourself. 

What happens if a firm goes out of business? Then the underlying investments — which are held at a “custodian” — can be transferred to another broker on your behalf. You can ask each firm about the details of their custodian arrangement, but as far as we were able to determine, every firm listed holds your investments at a custodian that is a member of IIROC.

So, aside from the usual risk of the investments themselves and completely unforseen events, investing with the relatively new robo-advisors should be no more risky than traditional means.

WHO WE ARE

Sandi Martin

Fee-for-service Financial Planner

ABOUT SANDI

Sandi Martin is an ex-banker turned fee-for-service financial planner at Spring Personal Finance who works with clients across the country from her home base in Gravenhurst. She built the original spreadsheet-based version of this calculator to win an argument with someone about whether you could categorically declare any robo-advisor “the best”. That probably tells you quite a lot about her.

twittericon

 

John Robertson

PhD | Author of Value of Simple

ABOUT JOHN

John Robertson, PhD, is a scientist who translates medical jargon into normal people language for a living. He is the author of a personal finance guide to DIY investing called The Value of Simple, and teaches regular people how to become DIY investors through his online course Practical Index Investing for Canadians. He also investigates (and sometimes rants about) deep money questions on his blog HolyPotato.net.

twittericon

REVIEWS | COMING SOON

 

Resolved: Contact form

We apologize to anyone who has sent us a comment or question through our contact form. Those messages did not go through, and cannot be retrieved. The pretty form has been replaced by one that actually works, so if you remember your question and still want to ask it,...

Wealthsimple changes fees

With the rollout of Wealthsimple Black, clients with account values between $100,000 and $250,000 will now enjoy lower management fees (0.40% instead of 0.50%). The management fee tier of 0.35% for clients with $1,000,000 and up has been eliminated, although it's...

CONTACT US